Mr. King has successfully represented clients in a wide variety of appellate matters, including the following published victories in cases he has argued since the turn of the century:
Gull Industries, Inc v Granite State Insurance Co., 18 Wn. App.2d 842, 493 P.3d 1183 (2021) (pollution insurance)
Maxwell v. Atlantic Richfield Co., 15Wn. App.2d 569, 476 P.3d 645 (2020) (design and construction statute of repose)
Mohandessi v. Urban Venture LLC, 13 Wn. App.2d 681, 468 P.3d 622 (2020) (condominium governance)
Keodalah v. Allstate, 194 Wn.2d 339, 449 P.3d 1040 (2019) (insurance bad faith claims against employee adjusters)
Ada Motors, Inc. v. Butler, 7 Wn. App.2d 53, 432 P.3d 445 (2018) (trade secrets)
Adamson v. Port of Bellingham, 907 F.3d 1122 (9th Cir. 2018) (scope of general maritime law “gangplank” rule)
Noll v. American Biltrite, Inc., 188 Wn.2d 402, 395 P.3d 1021 (2017) (“stream of commerce” personal jurisdiction)
Baseball Club of Tacoma v. SDL Baseball Partners, LLC, 187 Wn. App. 519, 348 P.3d 1283 (2015) (anti-SLAPP)
Department of Labor & Industries v. Tesoro Refining & Marketing Co., LLC, 186 Wn. App. 240, 347 P.3d 63 (2015) (statutory writ requirements)
Bunch v. Nationwide Mutual Ins. Co., 180 Wn. App. 37, 321 P.3d 266 (2014) (Priority of Action rule)
Barabin v. Asten-Johnson, 730 F.3d 457 (9th Cir. 2014) (en banc) (Daubert expert witness requirements)
Angelo Property Co. v. Hafiz, 67 Wn. App. 789, 274 P.3d 1075 (2012) (unlawful detainer)
City of Tacoma v. City of Bonney Lake, 173 Wn.2d 584, 269 P.3d 1017 (2012) (municipal indemnification obligations)
Tatham v. Rogers, 170 Wn. App. 76, 283 P.3d 583 (2012) (judicial recusal)
Cummings v. Budget Tank Removal & Env. Servs., 163 Wn. App. 379, 260 P.3d 220 (2011) (arbitration)
In re K.R.P., 160 Wn. App. 215, 247 P.3d 49 (2011) (genetic testing to determine parentage)
Grays Harbor Energy, LLC v. Grays Harbor County, 151 Wn. App. 550, 213 P.3d 609 (2009) (characterization of power plant equipment for property tax)
16th Street Investors, LLC v. Morrison, 153 Wn. App. 44, 223 P.3d 513 (2009) (“agreement to agree” contract formation)
Braaten v. Saberhagen Holdings, 165 Wn.2d 373, 198 P.3d 493 (2008) (duty to warn of hazards caused by another’s product)
Bank of America v. Prestance Corp., 160 Wn.2d 560, 160 P.3d 17 (2007) (equitable subrogation of real estate refinancing lien)
Hamoui v. Ashcroft, 389 F.3d 821 (9th Cir. 2004) (immigration asylum for fear of persecution)
Lund v. San Joaquin Valley R.R., 1 Cal. Rptr. 3d 412, 71 P.3d 770 (2003) (FELA)
Seattle v. Burlington Northern Railway Co, 145 Wn.2d 661, 43 P.3d 1169 (2002) (federal preemption of local railroad regulations)
Guijosa v. Wal-Mart, 144 Wn.2d 907, 32 P.3d 250 (2001) (inconsistent verdicts and consumer protection claims)
Hadley v. Maxwell, 144 Wn.2d 30, 627 P.3d 600 (2001) (collateral estoppel effect of contested traffic infractions)
Hill v. BCTI, 144 Wn.2d 172, 23 P.3d 440 (2001) (employment discrimination)
Glasebrook v. Mutual of Omaha, 100 Wn. App. 538, 997 P.2d 981 (2000) (health care regulations)
Goeble v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Ctr., 100 Wn. App. 609, 1 P.3d 579 (2000) (employment discrimination)